Close
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 25
  1. #11
    .
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Florissant
    Posts
    4,380

    Default

    After the NFL's recent threat against Georgia over not supporting the ghey, I doubt they'll put up a fuss over this.

  2. #12
    Guest
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Westminster, CO
    Posts
    2,741

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sawin View Post
    I can't say I'm surprised by this, and figure it's just a matter of time... Once legalized and legitimized country-wide, these companies are going to be marketing themselves everywhere... The irony of "Mile High" is impossible to ignore. It will be up to the Broncos organization to make the decision to take their money or not...
    So people are ok with all the ads from Bud, Miller, Coors, Corona, Jim Beam, Jack Daniels, Smirnoff and more alcohol manufacturers, but no weed allowed? Because, no one ever ruined their life or other peoples' lives by drinking alcohol...

  3. #13
    Nerdy Mod
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    2,406

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dave View Post
    So people are ok with all the ads from Bud, Miller, Coors, Corona, Jim Beam, Jack Daniels, Smirnoff and more alcohol manufacturers, but no weed allowed? Because, no one ever ruined their life or other peoples' lives by drinking alcohol...
    This. For some, the hypocrisy is tangible.

    O2
    YOU are the first responder. Police, fire and medical are SECOND responders.
    When seconds count, the police are mere minutes away...
    Gun registration is gun confiscation in slow motion.

    My feedback: https://www.ar-15.co/threads/53226-O2HeN2

  4. #14
    Grand Master Know It All Sawin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    144th & I25
    Posts
    3,937

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dave View Post
    So people are ok with all the ads from Bud, Miller, Coors, Corona, Jim Beam, Jack Daniels, Smirnoff and more alcohol manufacturers, but no weed allowed? Because, no one ever ruined their life or other peoples' lives by drinking alcohol...
    That comparison is precisely why I said it's just a matter of time. I believe it to be an analogous reality.
    Please leave any relevant feedback here:
    Sawin - Feedback thread.

  5. #15
    Zombie Slayer
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Pueblo
    Posts
    6,973

    Default

    Smile High!
    Per Ardua ad Astra

  6. #16
    Zombie Slayer Aloha_Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    6,555

    Default

    I really couldn't care less what the Numbskulls Felons and Losers do anymore. They reflect the general decadence of modern society so why not get a laugh from "Mile High" stadium. They can play a rockified version of "Rocky Mountain High" as their theme song when people enter ...

  7. #17
    Gourmet Catfood Connoisseur StagLefty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    6,641

    Default

    Native Roots Field at Mile High hosting the Denver Doobies- I like it
    Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to Fight, he'll just kill you.

  8. #18
    .
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Florissant
    Posts
    4,380

    Default

    Drug tests for welfare recipients - 100% enforceable

  9. #19
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by foxtrot View Post
    Crazy thought:

    What if instead of a legal drinking and pot age, we had a different standard:

    Proof of sufficiency and contribution.

    To be legal to drink or smoke, either you are actively employed and self sufficient (e.g. not living at parents house) or you are retired from active employment. If you are self sufficient at age 15, you are legal. If you are still living with your parents at age 30, you are not. Obviously, it would be very difficult to enforce but this is imagination land here - theoretically motivate some people to get off their duff, and motivate leeches to stay away.
    No
    Quote Originally Posted by davsel View Post
    Drug tests for welfare recipients - 100% enforceable
    Yes
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  10. #20
    Ammocurious Rucker61's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Posts
    3,359

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by davsel View Post
    Drug tests for welfare recipients - 100% enforceable
    What's the ROI on these test?
    Te occidere possunt sed te edere non possunt nefas est

    Sane person with a better sight picture

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •