I have had them on hand and have been shooting one since early March.
With the .46 end cap unchanged-
Compared to Octane HD the Hybrid is noticeably quieter and slightly heavier with piston setup.
Compared to the saker the Hybrid is quieter and lighter including the ASR mount.
Compared to Omega they sound almost identical to me with .300/.308 until under full auto then the Hybrid is louder. Hybrid is slightly heavier than the Omega when ASR mount is attached.
Different tools for different jobs, price and the Ford, Chevy, Dodge bias appear to me are the factors when buying a can.
If someone has the funds to buy a dedicated can for 20 different calibers then heck yes do it.
If someone wants a dedicated .308 can and they have the cash then get a TBAC.
If someone wants a modular, light, quiet multiple host get an Omega.
If someone wants a light, skinny, tough can with great pistol suppression for 9-45 get an Octane HD.
If someone wants a saker based on published numbers, or a slightly larger, heavier can than an Omega that handles .338, .458 and 45/70 etc. get a Hybrid.
If someone wants to cover their pistols and rifles but doesn't want the cost of a pistol can, rifle can and 2 tax stamps then get a Hybrid.
Let's say you buy a Hybrid, a 5.56 direct thread, ASR attachment, 5.56 brake, .308 brake and all 3 popular Pistons you are still ahead dollar wise compared to buying a Saker or Omega can plus the Octane.
I have no opinions on any other can with side by side comparisons with the Hybrid other than an SDN-6, Dead air Sandman, Dead air Ti, Surefire Socom 762RC and a TBAC Ultra 338. My opinion is lb per lb with the above comparing price, weight, db reduction, modularity the Hybrid beats everything for what I ask of it. Only exception would be the TBAC Ultra 338 clearly beats the Hybrid but that's like saying I would be surprised a Ferrari just beat a Jeep Wrangler in a drag race down Parker rd.
Your mileage may vary.....
If you have questions or I can help at all just pm me.