Close
Results 1 to 10 of 115

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Zombie Slayer Aloha_Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    6,566

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by roberth View Post
    Yup, they don't understand economics. During the Reagan years when tax rate percentages were reduced the government actually took in more money because the tax rate reductions increased economic growth.
    It's not about economics. It's about a backdoor way to discourage people from participating in the firearms trade and thereby reducing access or inclination. I'm sure this was red-teamed and debated before they unveiled this new "guidance" and the fact they don't have any power under Article II to do this or that it will do nothing to increase revenues has nothing to do with it.

  2. #2
    CO-AR's Secret Jedi roberth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Elk City, Oklahoma
    Posts
    10,501

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aloha_Shooter View Post
    It's not about economics. It's about a backdoor way to discourage people from participating in the firearms trade and thereby reducing access or inclination. I'm sure this was red-teamed and debated before they unveiled this new "guidance" and the fact they don't have any power under Article II to do this or that it will do nothing to increase revenues has nothing to do with it.
    Oh yes, I understand that, I was commenting on Kazoo's comment.

    Losing how many thousands of dollars in the process.
    .gov imposes this regulation and then they lose all the tax revenue they would have gained by leaving gunsmiths alone. Gunsmiths generate income tax, tax on parts and labor, tax on the gasoline to travel to and from the gunsmith, etc., stupid government loses all that revenue.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •