Shooting at School in Parkland, Florida

[CoGirl303]

Columbine. But you knew that.

ETA:

School cop who 'never went in' after shooting has resigned

effing coward. He had a DUTY to go in. they need to take his badge and he can go find another line of work. He violated his oath.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Skip]

effing coward. He had a DUTY to go in. they need to take his badge and he can go find another line of work. He violated his oath.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

LE has no duty to protect.

Been messaged, ruled, and demonstrated many times. I am not being critical of LE by pointing this out. There are thousands of LEOs who would have gone in and made the ultimate sacrifice to save lives, no doubt.

This is why we own guns and why the fallacy of disarmament = safety has to be confronted.

[CoGirl303]

LE has no duty to protect.

Been messaged, ruled, and demonstrated many times. I am not being critical of LE by pointing this out. There are thousands of LEOs who would have gone in and made the ultimate sacrifice to save lives, no doubt.

This is why we own guns and why the fallacy of disarmament = safety has to be confronted.

I'm honestly astonished. I thought there was a police officers oath to "Serve and Protect", much like the oath in the military.

Glad to see he resigned. He isnt cut out for the job. What a disappointment. He could have saved so many lives.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Great-Kazoo]

I'm honestly astonished. I thought there was a police officers oath to "Serve and Protect", much like the oath in the military.

Glad to see he resigned. He isnt cut out for the job. What a disappointment. He could have saved so many lives.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

IIRC the SCOTUS ruled on said topic.

[Skip]

I'm honestly astonished. I thought there was a police officers oath to "Serve and Protect", much like the oath in the military.

Glad to see he resigned. He isnt cut out for the job. What a disappointment. He could have saved so many lives.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Oh there is an oath.

They just technically have no legal duty to protect us even when they have knowledge of a specific threat. That has gone all the up to USSC and been affirmed.

[CoGirl303]

Oh there is an oath.

They just technically have no legal duty to protect us even when they have knowledge of a specific threat. That has gone all the up to USSC and been affirmed.

smh. what good is the damn thing if it doesnt have to be followed?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Skip]

smh. what good is the damn thing if it doesnt have to be followed?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We are in an era where words don't mean what we know them to mean.

What good is the Second Amendment after 1934?

Anyone else find it odd that this info on the SRO no engaging the threat came out after the CNN town hall that pushed taking guns away in favor of having the police protect us? Why didn't the Sheriff bring it up yesterday?

Not odd, part of the plan. Facts that contradict the narrative are not permitted.

The only thing that surprises me is that we eventually found out. We're still waiting for some facts on Las Vegas (and I think Sandy Hook too).

We had to wait for the Columbine Report to come out to know...

http://extras.denverpost.com/news/col0516a.htm

May 16 - While Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold casually murdered classmates in the Columbine High library, at least six Jefferson County sheriff's deputies waited outside the school for help.

Two of those deputies already had traded gunfire with the killers in the opening moments of the attack. But by the time the first SWAT team trailed Harris and Klebold inside Columbine, the worst school shooting in U.S. history already was over.

[snip]

My understanding is that this was not cowardice but they were specifically ordered by watch not to go in and wait for SWAT. Huge mistake.

I don't recall this fact being reported until the Columbine Report came out which I think was 2001 (could be wrong about that).

[muddywings]

We are in an era where words don't mean what we know them to mean.

What good is the Second Amendment after 1934?



Not odd, part of the plan. Facts that contradict the narrative are not permitted.

The only thing that surprises me is that we eventually found out. We're still waiting for some facts on Las Vegas (and I think Sandy Hook too).

We had to wait for the Columbine Report to come out to know...

http://extras.denverpost.com/news/col0516a.htm



My understanding is that this was not cowardice but they were specifically ordered by watch not to go in and wait for SWAT. Huge mistake.

I don't recall this fact being reported until the Columbine Report came out which I think was 2001 (could be wrong about that).

Police tactics for Columbine didn’t have the aggressive, immediately engage the shooter(s) tactics that are in place today. The tactics changed due to Columbine and this deputy failed to properly follow the current SOPs. More children died because of this deputy’s inaction and the fbi and local leo inaction.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk