LE has no duty to protect.
Been messaged, ruled, and demonstrated many times. I am not being critical of LE by pointing this out. There are thousands of LEOs who would have gone in and made the ultimate sacrifice to save lives, no doubt.
This is why we own guns and why the fallacy of disarmament = safety has to be confronted.
Always eat the vegans first
This will, unfortunately, poke a big hole in the "only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with a gun." argument. Of course you can try to do damage control and argue that the deputy wasn't that good of a good guy, or that he was protecting those in his immediate area, but that won't fly and the damage has been done.
"There are no finger prints under water."
We know that, but we also know that it won't matter. There is no way to know if him taking different actions could have saved lives or not, but I personally feel comfortable assuming that he missed an opportunity to do good. This could go down in history as a real life example of evil prevailing when good men take no action.![]()
"There are no finger prints under water."
We keep hearing that teachers don't have the necessary training or skills to take on an active shooter, but police do. Maybe not *all* the police are suited for it either.
Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
-Me
I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
-Also Me
When seconds count, that cop 30 feet away ain't comin to help you.
The Great Kazoo's Feedback
"when you're happy you enjoy the melody but, when you're broken you understand the lyrics".
I'm honestly astonished. I thought there was a police officers oath to "Serve and Protect", much like the oath in the military.
Glad to see he resigned. He isnt cut out for the job. What a disappointment. He could have saved so many lives.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk