Close
Page 23 of 43 FirstFirst ... 13181920212223242526272833 ... LastLast
Results 221 to 230 of 423
  1. #221
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Northglenn, CO
    Posts
    947

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gman View Post
    effing coward. He had a DUTY to go in. they need to take his badge and he can go find another line of work. He violated his oath.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  2. #222
    BANNED....or not? Skip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Highlands Ranch, CO
    Posts
    3,871

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CoGirl303 View Post
    effing coward. He had a DUTY to go in. they need to take his badge and he can go find another line of work. He violated his oath.

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    LE has no duty to protect.

    Been messaged, ruled, and demonstrated many times. I am not being critical of LE by pointing this out. There are thousands of LEOs who would have gone in and made the ultimate sacrifice to save lives, no doubt.

    This is why we own guns and why the fallacy of disarmament = safety has to be confronted.
    Always eat the vegans first

  3. #223
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    This will, unfortunately, poke a big hole in the "only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with a gun." argument. Of course you can try to do damage control and argue that the deputy wasn't that good of a good guy, or that he was protecting those in his immediate area, but that won't fly and the damage has been done.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  4. #224
    Possesses Antidote for "Cool" Gman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Puyallup, WA
    Posts
    17,848

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irving View Post
    This will, unfortunately, poke a big hole in the "only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with a gun." argument.
    Well, the argument wasn't "only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with a gun hiding in the parking lot".
    Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
    -Me

    I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
    -Also Me


  5. #225
    BANNED....or not? Skip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Highlands Ranch, CO
    Posts
    3,871

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gman View Post
    Well, the argument wasn't "only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with a gun hiding in the parking lot".
    LIKE
    Always eat the vegans first

  6. #226
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    We know that, but we also know that it won't matter. There is no way to know if him taking different actions could have saved lives or not, but I personally feel comfortable assuming that he missed an opportunity to do good. This could go down in history as a real life example of evil prevailing when good men take no action.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  7. #227
    Possesses Antidote for "Cool" Gman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Puyallup, WA
    Posts
    17,848

    Default

    We keep hearing that teachers don't have the necessary training or skills to take on an active shooter, but police do. Maybe not *all* the police are suited for it either.
    Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
    -Me

    I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
    -Also Me


  8. #228
    Bang Bang Ridge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cedar Park, TX
    Posts
    8,307

    Default

    When seconds count, that cop 30 feet away ain't comin to help you.

  9. #229
    The "Godfather" of COAR Great-Kazoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Washboard Alley, AZ.
    Posts
    48,076

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irving View Post
    We know that, but we also know that it won't matter. There is no way to know if him taking different actions could have saved lives or not, but I personally feel comfortable assuming that he missed an opportunity to do good. This could go down in history as a real life example of evil prevailing when good men take no action.
    He stood outside for 4 minutes while this was going on. He should be charged as an accessory.
    The Great Kazoo's Feedback

    "when you're happy you enjoy the melody but, when you're broken you understand the lyrics".

  10. #230
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Northglenn, CO
    Posts
    947

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Skip View Post
    LE has no duty to protect.

    Been messaged, ruled, and demonstrated many times. I am not being critical of LE by pointing this out. There are thousands of LEOs who would have gone in and made the ultimate sacrifice to save lives, no doubt.

    This is why we own guns and why the fallacy of disarmament = safety has to be confronted.
    I'm honestly astonished. I thought there was a police officers oath to "Serve and Protect", much like the oath in the military.

    Glad to see he resigned. He isnt cut out for the job. What a disappointment. He could have saved so many lives.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •