It seems that every time I see a used XD go up for sale it is usually a 45. I don't seem to notice as many 9mm or 40 cal ones hit the market. Is there a reason people are getting rid of their XD45s?
It seems that every time I see a used XD go up for sale it is usually a 45. I don't seem to notice as many 9mm or 40 cal ones hit the market. Is there a reason people are getting rid of their XD45s?
Every tactical instructor I know of doesn't trust them because they jam up during classes. This applies to ALL XD models, the non M 9mm is the most reliable version, but this is relative. One 9mm locked up during fighting pistol. I can send you links to threads or just join getoffthex.com and search for xd problems (don't post the same question they don't like repeating themselves)
Get a glock or m&p.
I've never heard about that problem with XDs and seriously doubt that is why people are selling them.
"There are no finger prints under water."
My guess was that it is strictly numbers. If SA sold more of the XDs in 45 than other calibers then it would make sense that most of the ones on the used market are 45s. That was my original thought. Just wasn't sure.
That's what I was thinking as well. If not, then I guess no one trusts Glock 9mm either.
"There are no finger prints under water."
Seen it happen. The gun had to be put in a vice and beat open with a hammer. The instructors made it clear that it's a semi common occurrence for XD's. The M series have a weak barrel ramp and get dents from rapid fire ball ammo.
Then there's the parts availability issues.
I don't think it's why they're being sold, but it's certainly kept me from buying one. A shame because they're much more comfortable than a glock.
Are you talking about XD or XDM? They are different handguns. I'm guessin' we can compare good reviews to bad reviews all day.
After break in, I have had no problems with an XD40. The XD45 is still in the break in process but has had no problems.
Personally, I am not a fan of Glock ergonomics. Granted, they are reliable.
YMMV