Make Colorado a FREE STATE!

[BigBear]

[quote=Bailey Guns;223807]I'll be behind Dan Maes all the way....with a shotgun!![/quote]


Fixed for ya!

[jim02]

How does voting for a guy that can't beat Hickenlooper make Colorado any more free? Seems like it's a vote in the opposite direction if you ask me.

Thats what the repiblican party wants you to think, same thing both the dems and reps made people believe about Ross Perot.
The Colorado republican party is a shit pile and has once again proven they can only put out horrible canidates, this is because they put canidates up by the "its your turn now" method of endorsing canidates.
Dan has made it to the primary because "We The People" have brought him here and "We the People" can win any election if we can stop lisitening to the parties and vote for whom we want and not whom they give us.

I am behind Dan, not because I think hes as clean as a whistle but because I think he will work for us and I know Scott will not.
Scott has served us before and look at all the great stuff he did, yeah I dont see it either. But he did name a mountain range after his family, wow great work Scott

[BadShot]

So Tancredo is not a 2nd Amendment supporter eh?

http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/Tom_...un_Control.htm

Sorry, he's getting my vote, none of the other fucktards are even close to him.

[cowboykjohnson]

So the primary is between a giant douche and a shit sandwich?


Great, just great.

Don't you see all elections are between a giant douche and a turd sandwich!

[Ranger]

In Colorado, all the candidates suck. There isn't a single NON ass-hat running. Lickyourpooper is going to win, hands down, it's now just a matter of how well we show. Having a strong republican base doesn't get anyone elected, it's the swing voters that ultimately choose, and few of those are going for McGinnis OR Maes. We're strong this season in other places though, so I think we'll take back control of the state via the house and senate, I'll have to be happy enough with that.

[OgenRwot]

Thats what the repiblican party wants you to think, same thing both the dems and reps made people believe about Ross Perot.

Yeah, and when Perot took nearly 20% of the popular vote from Bush we had Bill Clinton for eight years. Again, I ask, what's better: Clinton/Hickenlooper who you agree with 0% of the time or Bush/Maes/McInnis who you agree with 80% of the time?

[jim02]

So Tancredo is not a 2nd Amendment supporter eh?

http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/Tom_...un_Control.htm

Sorry, he's getting my vote, none of the other fucktards are even close to him.

He's not in the race yet, he has to find a party to run for still. Let him get on the ballot first, then we can vote for him.

[DOC]

I don't know much about the R letter people running but I do know that once they comfortable in office its back to BS laws that rub me wrong everytime. But its better then Lickenpooper who told me that I had to let Code Enforcement anywhere they wanted to go on my property. Cops can't even do that without cause. But in a typical 2 faced politician way they haven't been back so he said one thing and maybe did the opposite and told them Code Enforcers to back off.

[jim02]

Yeah, and when Perot took nearly 20% of the popular vote from Bush we had Bill Clinton for eight years. Again, I ask, what's better: Clinton/Hickenlooper who you agree with 0% of the time or Bush/Maes/McInnis who you agree with 80% of the time?

I think the polls after the election showed that if people voted for whom they wanted to and not for whom their party convinced them to vote for, Perot would have won. The 2 party system was effective in defending their power system that year.

So lets vote for another shity republican canidate just so they can keep their power system in tact.

Until we clean up the republican party we will never get this nation turned around. We dont clean it up by voting for whom they tell us to.

Right now they are telling us McGinnis is no good and they know it, so we should vote for him and then they will ask him to sit out and we will assign you a new canidate that is better. They are the ones that gave us McGinnis in the first place.

I am the swing voter the republican party needs, I dont vote for a party I vote for the canidate.
The die hard republicnas will use the same tatic the dems use, they will say I am the problem, its always someone elses fault, the republican party needs to look within to find the root of there political problems.

I took this pledge "I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same" I did not pledge allegiance to any party.

[DOC]

So we need to run Tea Party people under the Republican name. That way it won't split the votes. If we get some to run under the Dems too that would ensure that the better people get elected and the lesser people can go back to chasing ambulances.