Bloomberg running for president.

[hurley842002]

More TDS from OxArt...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Great-Kazoo]

More TDS from OxArt...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

wouldn't that be tBs ?

bloomberg's only interest is to do as much damage to Trump as possible. Having an election platform to do so is a bonus. They've hated each other for decades.

Of course this only shows how hypocritical the D's are when it comes to their RICH, OLD, WHITE MAN condition.

[FoxtArt]

More TDS from OxArt...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What does Trump and Muhammad have in common? Their worshippers can't accept a joke. When observational commentary on the Trainwreck of two billionaires being nominated is "Trump derangement".... Muhammad is just as sacred in some countries.

I do agree with Hummer's assessment. Bloomberg is dangerous. And the real problem with Trump is he is NOT a strong candidate. The reason the media pushed him so hard in 2016 is out of all possible R nominees, he polled the worst against Clinton, and Clinton drastically was doing almost the worst in their party.

Basically the D have a free court shot to elect whatever the hell they want to, with a strong possibility that wouldn't otherwise exist, because T is as hated (statistically) as HRC, and the only reason T got elected, e.g. squeaked enough votes, IS that hatred of HRC, which motivated her opposition. Bloomberg doesn't quite have the same level, and he has more $.

Without that universal co-hatred of candidates; Trump's chances of a second term may only be as good as a three legged horse at the derby esp while outspent.

[Rucker61]

What does Trump and Muhammad have in common? Their worshippers can't accept a joke. When observational commentary on the Trainwreck of two billionaires being nominated is "Trump derangement".... Muhammad is just as sacred in some countries.

I do agree with Hummer's assessment. Bloomberg is dangerous. And the real problem with Trump is he is NOT a strong candidate. The reason the media pushed him so hard in 2016 is out of all possible R nominees, he polled the worst against Clinton, and Clinton drastically was doing almost the worst in their party.

Basically the D have a free court shot to elect whatever the hell they want to, with a strong possibility that wouldn't otherwise exist, because T is as hated (statistically) as HRC, and the only reason T got elected, e.g. squeaked enough votes, IS that hatred of HRC, which motivated her opposition. Bloomberg doesn't quite have the same level, and he has more $.

Without that universal co-hatred of candidates; Trump's chances of a second term may only be as good as a three legged horse at the derby esp while outspent.

Agreed.