I could see the argument that health insurance companies could be concerned about HIV costs or something, except I'd think that a married couple would be less at risk because you would assume that they are monogamous. Not to mention that there is probably not much difference between two single policies and one double policy. Further, with Obamacare taking effect, everyone in the US is supposed to be able to get coverage now anyway, so I can hardly see how that matters. Perhaps this is a recent change in policy due to upcoming Obamacare and the timing made it look like it had something to do with same sex couples.
"There are no finger prints under water."
Did no one consider that perhaps hip55 works at the YMCA?
"A lot of people seem obliged to have a viewpoint."
What does that have to do with other people though?
I just got engaged. Should we not get married so we don't cost you extra money?
"There are no finger prints under water."