Close
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 174

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Varmiteer
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Woodland Park
    Posts
    692

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cofi View Post
    Me too I don't even see how people have an issue with it
    I don't see why people think it is okay.

  2. #2
    Master of the Metallic Element Tinelement's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Broomfield
    Posts
    3,463

    Default

    Ya know.....

    I don't know. (Deep down its all wrong)

    I'm still 50/50 on it.

    If you aren't in that position it's a tuff call.

    Like I'm not (this should ruffle some feather) a woman, so I dont know what it's like to make the decision to put my body and mind through an abortion.

  3. #3
    Bang Bang Ridge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cedar Park, TX
    Posts
    8,307

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jumpstart View Post
    I don't see why people think it is okay.
    Why is it up to the government to have any say in something that is purely of religious notion?

  4. #4
    Varmiteer
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Eastern Wyoming
    Posts
    574

    Default

    there should NOT be government recognized marriage. just civil unions or contracts, as i see it.

    if a religious institution wants to marry you, well thats yours and their business. be it man man, woman woman, man woman woman woman, etc. if your choice of religion will marry you go for it. the government should only recognize contracts between individuals.

  5. #5
    Guest
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Milliken, CO
    Posts
    1,421

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HBARleatherneck View Post
    there should NOT be government recognized marriage. just civil unions or contracts, as i see it.

    if a religious institution wants to marry you, well thats yours and their business. be it man man, woman woman, man woman woman woman, etc. if your choice of religion will marry you go for it. the government should only recognize contracts between individuals.
    BINGO!! couldn't agree more. Contracts/civil unions can handle all the legalities there should be no benefits either way, single married, married to 5 women, or 2 dudes. Get the govt out of the marriage business and 95% of people won't give a flying F what 2 people want to do.

  6. #6
    Amateur meat smoker blacklabel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Greeley
    Posts
    6,557

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by XC700116 View Post
    BINGO!! couldn't agree more. Contracts/civil unions can handle all the legalities there should be no benefits either way, single married, married to 5 women, or 2 dudes. Get the govt out of the marriage business and 95% of people won't give a flying F what 2 people want to do.
    You and Hbar nailed it. The government needs to stay the hell out of it.

  7. #7
    Paper Hunter
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    238

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HBARleatherneck View Post
    there should NOT be government recognized marriage. just civil unions or contracts, as i see it.

    if a religious institution wants to marry you, well thats yours and their business. be it man man, woman woman, man woman woman woman, etc. if your choice of religion will marry you go for it. the government should only recognize contracts between individuals.
    Couldn't agree more.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jumpstart View Post
    Part 1. Tell me why it is necessary for two men to get an arbitrary piece of paper that says they are together?

    Part 2. Devaluation of real marriages = Divorces >children hurt > crime rates higher single family homes> teen pregnancy > higher drug use > moral decay > breakdown of societies.

    Hence marriage needs valuation in our times, not devaluation.
    Are you sure that the devaluation of marriage is affected by gays and not by the change in morals by straight couples?

    Quote Originally Posted by BPTactical View Post
    3-Adoption-Bullshit. It takes a man and a woman to make a child and it takes a man and a woman to raise a child.
    I can tell you as a fact that mammal offspring can be created by from only females.
    Furthermore plenty of single parents have raised children successfully. Maybe you think I should head down to the battered women's shelter and tell those women that if they have children and they don't get back with a man ASAP then they risk forever corrupting their children!

  8. #8
    Ammosexual GilpinGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Rural Gilpin County
    Posts
    7,221

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flatline View Post
    I can tell you as a fact that mammal offspring can be created by from only females.
    Any of them ever been human? We are a bit different than, say, platypuses (are they even mammals?).

  9. #9
    SSDG
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Fort Collins
    Posts
    94

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flatline View Post
    Furthermore plenty of single parents have raised children successfully.
    Yeah, I don't buy the idea that it takes a man and a woman to raise a child either.

    Nor would my single mother.

    Can it be a better scenario? Yes, given the right set of circumstances: Two parents that are respectful of each other, hold each other as equals, work together to maintain a consistent set of expectations, etc.

    But nobody... NOBODY... is going to convince me that I would have been better off if my mother had stayed with the physically abusive alcoholic womanizing piece of mule dung that was my biological sperm donor.

  10. #10
    Varmiteer
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Woodland Park
    Posts
    692

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ridge View Post
    Why is it up to the government to have any say in something that is purely of religious notion?
    1. It's not purely a religious notion.
    2.It's not up to the government, it's up to the people. (excluding abuse of powers)
    3. Marriage is for building families,
    Families for building nations.
    Homosexaulity is for what now?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •