Close
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 51

Thread: the holmes case

  1. #11
    Sig Fantastic Ronin13's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Arvada, CO
    Posts
    10,268

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BuffCyclist View Post
    Agreed. I made a comment to my fiancee about how a reporter said something along the lines of "Holmes is being held for allegedly entering a midnight ...".

    I'm like, allegedly? Seriously? They caught him with guns in hand, he was wearing body armor, his apartment was rigged with explosives and other incendiary devices and he allegedly did that?!
    Despite the facts, you still need to remember "Innocent until proven guilty." I agree with you, but it's our justice system and to give in to emotional pressure and just take him out back and put a slug through his dome without trial just undermines the whole thing.
    "There is no news in the truth, and no truth in the news."
    "The revolution will not be televised... Instead it will be filmed from multiple angles via cell phone cameras, promptly uploaded to YouTube, Tweeted about, and then shared on Facebook, pending a Wi-Fi connection."

  2. #12
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    SE Denver
    Posts
    2,197

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BushMasterBoy View Post
    I did not see it, but I figure the guy will end up in the state mental hospital (prison) here in Pueblo. I see a plea of "not guilty by reason of insanity". The state will then drug him up until his brain is mush, destroying it with chemicals that will permanently lobotomize him over time.
    If he is sent to a regular prison in Canon City or Sterling, the general population of inmates will off him for a candy bar...I couldn't be a jailer because I would accidently leave a rope in his cell.

    Very small chance of him getting off by insanity, at least in Colorado.
    Quote Originally Posted by BuffCyclist View Post
    Agreed. I made a comment to my fiancee about how a reporter said something along the lines of "Holmes is being held for allegedly entering a midnight ...".

    I'm like, allegedly? Seriously? They caught him with guns in hand, he was wearing body armor, his apartment was rigged with explosives and other incendiary devices and he allegedly did that?!
    Innocent until proven guilty, even if guilt is doubtless, he still deserves a trial. It's as American as the 2nd amendment.

    It's just semantics, don't get hung up on it. They always have to speak in "the accused".
    Keep Calm and Carry.

  3. #13
    Gives a sh!t; pretends he doesn't HoneyBadger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    C-Springs again! :)
    Posts
    14,821
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    To repeat exactly what has already been said: Innocent until proven guilty applies to all US citizens who allegedly break the law. Time to hold the emotions for a minute and respect that we have fair trials in our great country. Most countries don't and many places around the world, you are "guilty until you prove to the authority that without a doubt, you are innocent"
    My Feedback

    "When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law." -Frederic Bastiat

    "I am a conservative. Quite possibly I am on the losing side; often I think so. Yet, out of a curious perversity I had rather lose with Socrates, let us say, than win with Lenin."
    ― Russell Kirk, Author of The Conservative Mind

  4. #14
    Definitively Not A Gong Shooter
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Bakersfield CA
    Posts
    1,084

    Default

    Everyone has the right to a fair trial. All of you constitution buffs should know that.

  5. #15
    Caught Behind Enemy Lines
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    denver/plattsmouth
    Posts
    2,954

    Default

    Is it still a fair trial if he is drugged ?

  6. #16
    Fire Crotch
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Charlottesville, VA
    Posts
    6,508

    Default

    Yea yea yea, innocent until proven guilty. I get that.

    It's just the language used, like its just a rumor that he did those things. The media gets things wrong all the time, but this is the one thing that is ever present.

  7. #17
    Industry Partner cysoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Brighton, CO
    Posts
    1,049

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BushMasterBoy View Post
    I couldn't be a jailer because I would accidently leave a rope in his cell.
    He had the chance to eat a bullet and he didn't do it. I doubt he would be man enough to string a rope around his neck.

  8. #18
    Say "Car RAMROD!" J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 1983
    Location
    Westminster, CO
    Posts
    4,012

    Default

    For a group of people who hold the 2nd amendment so dearly, some of you are awful quick to throw out amendments 5 & 6.

    Quote Originally Posted by 5th Amendment
    No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
    Quote Originally Posted by 6th Amendment
    In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
    --J
    My Feedback

    "Praise be to our prophet, John Moses Browning, who hath bestowed upon us the new testament of shooting. Delivered unto us, his disciples, on 29 March 1911 A.D."



  9. #19
    Guest
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Sedalia, CO
    Posts
    941

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cysoto View Post
    He had the chance to eat a bullet and he didn't do it. I doubt he would be man enough to string a rope around his neck.
    After a few years of isolation in max security a rope or bedsheet might seem good.

    He's got the toughest DA in Colorado. More death penalty cases than the rest.

    Steve

  10. #20
    I cried and got a title waxthis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Windsor,West side. But NOT on the hill.
    Posts
    5,613

    Default

    Well, he could accidentally get shot while tryin to escape......
    "An individual is only entiteld to one's rights as long as one respects the rights of others."...R.F.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •