Gun control commentary

[ChadAmberg]

http://lewrockwell.com/orig13/karger1.1.1.html

"When they come for my gun, they will have to pry it out of my cold, dead hands," is a common refrain I often hear from the Neo-Cons when there is a threat, credible or otherwise, that the US government is going to take their firearms.

And, when I hear this crazy talk, I agree with them openly. "You are right. They will pry your gun from your cold dead hands," which I often follow with the question, "And where will that leave you except face down in a pool of your own blood the middle of the street, just another dead fool resisting the State?"

Dude needs a basic lesson in the definition of a neo-con.

Discuss.

[kanekutter05]

http://lewrockwell.com/orig13/karger1.1.1.html



Dude needs a basic lesson in the definition of a neo-con.

Discuss.

That guy is a real piece of shit IMHO. I couldn't tell (because that blog was copmpletely saturated with content for myself and those who think like me) but does that guy claim to be conservative?

If he's just going to roll over if (God forbid...when) they come to try and take our guns...what is he going to do if they try and close the free market that he seems to love so dearly and go to communism/socialism?

[Whistler]

Huh I read that completely differently except the Neo-con thing. It sounded more like a rant at the futility of confronting overwhelming odds and superior force.

I know it's a stretch he's probably just a douche but the man said "discuss".

[spqrzilla]

I don't visit Lewrockwell.com as there isn't hand disinfectant strong enough.

[funkymonkey1111]

http://lewrockwell.com/orig13/karger1.1.1.html



Dude needs a basic lesson in the definition of a neo-con.

Discuss.

Or, perhaps you do. The article simply calls out the dick-measuring tough guy's position that he's going to fight the armed state's power to confiscate your gun.

So, the coppers come to your door wanting your guns. Are you going to make your stand right then and there? Are you?

[Byte Stryke]

fear mongering Tort

[kanekutter05]

So, the coppers come to your door wanting your guns. Are you going to make your stand right then and there? Are you?

Since you're a member of this board my question to you is...why wouldn't you?

[Ronin13]

Since you're a member of this board my question to you is...why wouldn't you?

"I'd rather die standing for what I believe in, than live kneeling, licking the boots of tyrants."
End of thread.

[Whistler]

"I'd rather die standing for what I believe in, than live kneeling, licking the boots of tyrants."
End of thread.

Similar to one of my favorites, a sentiment expressed by Samuel Adams:

“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”

[ChadAmberg]

Or, perhaps you do. The article simply calls out the dick-measuring tough guy's position that he's going to fight the armed state's power to confiscate your gun.

The term "neo-con" has nothing to do with the gun owners at all.

Neo-con most accurately refers to former liberals who, when presented with the post 9/11 reality of the world, suddenly went very hawkish in foreign policy.

That's like saying "What are you Cadillac owners going to do when they come to take your guns?"

Neo-con gun owner, paleo-con gun owner, libertarian gun owner, liberal gun owner, a-political gun owner, it doesn't matter. People who own guns belong to all those groups of people and more. So why he specifically points at neo-cons makes no sense unless he's being stupidly provocative against one of the smallest subset of people who, being already shown to be "flexible" in their politics and would probably be the first to hand over their weapons. It's much more likely to be paleo-cons and libertarians to defend themselves.

And my actual response to this no talent ass clown:
Is he so ungodly stupid to think that the rank and file of the military would 1: be legally allowed to perform domestic law enforcement in US territory and 2: actually go along with something so unconstitutional? Because the relatively small amount of police in relation to gun owners in most of the country would quickly be wiped out assuming they had 100% participation also.