Romney and guns

[Teufelhund]

[Sharpienads]

Ok, so as stated above, he's been "flip-flop-ish". The video has clips from 4 years ago and 10 years ago. It doesn't show his response to alot of the questions. What's your point?

[Rust_shackleford]

Ok, so as stated above, he's been "flip-flop-ish". The video has clips from 4 years ago and 10 years ago. It doesn't show his response to alot of the questions. What's your point?

I guess I'll teach my kids to be politically expedient. No need to have character any more. Good luck with your next globalist puppet.

[sniper7]

I would have to say that his current stance is much better than Obamas.

What really matters is who is picking SCOTUS justices, how the house and senate elections fare, and hopefully no underhanded amendments are attached to anything important to both parties/the country

[Sharpienads]

I guess I'll teach my kids to be politically expedient. No need to have character any more. Good luck with your next globalist puppet.

Maybe you should teach them about federalism and how different levels of government have different powers/limitations.

To boil his 2A stance down to political expediency or lack of character is not taking all things into account, IMO. Is it a possibility that since 2002 his views have changed? And if so, are we going to beat him up over it, even if he has legitimately changed into something that we agree with? Or is it possible that what he views as acceptable for a state isn't acceptable at the federal level?

The point is to discuss the topic and be able to back up your opinions.

[ChunkyMonkey]

When it comes to the 2nd.. it boils down to this fact imho. Obama has been proven to bypass The US Congress by appointing Czars and issuing Executive Orders (In fact he issued 139 executive orders in lesser than 4 years). Our federal govt is designed to check and balance itself, if Obama gets his 2nd term, there is not such thing as check and balance!

[Ridge]

When it comes to the 2nd.. it boils down to this fact imho. Obama has been proven to bypass The US Congress by appointing Czars and issuing Executive Orders (In fact he issued 139 executive orders in lesser than 4 years). Our federal govt is designed to check and balance itself, if Obama gets his 2nd term, there is not such thing as check and balance!

And W also appointed many czars and issued 291 executive orders in his 8 years in office.

http://www.archives.gov/federal-regi...ers/wbush.html

[ChunkyMonkey]

And W also appointed many czars and issued 291 executive orders in his 8 years in office.

http://www.archives.gov/federal-regi...ers/wbush.html

Fact.. It's Romney vs Obama. I dont know about you.. I don't want another Bush, or Obama.. Obama has proven to be worse than Bush w/ those eo and czars numbers.

[Rucker61]

When it comes to the 2nd.. it boils down to this fact imho. Obama has been proven to bypass The US Congress by appointing Czars

True.

Listing of Executive Branch czars.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...e_branch_czars

and issuing Executive Orders (In fact he issued 139 executive orders in lesser than 4 years).

True.

Listing of numbers of executive orders issued, by President:

http://www.archives.gov/federal-regi...sposition.html

In number of executive orders issued by year in office, Obama comes in right after President Bush in lowest average at 38 per year, compared to 36 per year for GWB.

[Rust_shackleford]

Maybe you should teach them about federalism and how different levels of government have different powers/limitations.

To boil his 2A stance down to political expediency or lack of character is not taking all things into account, IMO. Is it a possibility that since 2002 his views have changed? And if so, are we going to beat him up over it, even if he has legitimately changed into something that we agree with? Or is it possible that what he views as acceptable for a state isn't acceptable at the federal level?

The point is to discuss the topic and be able to back up your opinions.

Drink the koolaid enjoy the collapse. I dare you to watch this and report back. Your Romney is a globalist dirt bag. His views have changed? Views? How about convictions? He must not have any, just views. I want my children to have convictions in regards to their GOD GIVEN RIGHTS, not views.
You would tear a liberal a new ass for flip flopping half as much as this liberal with an R after his name.
Mitt is not going to save the Republic but continue to kill it.
This link is his immigration policy
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-...ration-policy/
This link is Mitt's comedy hour!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_pgfWK3sxw