I think it's a better illustration of the illusion that killings are the fault of "guns". Getting rid of a tool, does not rid the evil that is a part of humankind.
I guess it makes people feel better that they think they are 'doing something' for their safety. It doesn't force them to come to the reality that their expectation of safety in the world that we live in is a false hope and defies natural law.
Last edited by Gman; 03-02-2014 at 10:39.
Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
-Me
I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
-Also Me
Gman did you notice his profile???
newb from boulder HMMM. I hate to be the one to harp on stereotypes, but this statement sure seems to fall in line with what we have come to expect from a boulderite. Disclaimer: I may be way off base.......
There are plenty of instances where the shooter, when confronted with security or private individuals who were properly armed with guns, gave themselves up or killed themsleves rather than continue their rampage.
The arapahoe high schooler and the mall shooter in Portland were the latest that come to mind.
this recent thread is of a 7 News story that ran recently about private individuals who defended themselves with their guns.
https://www.ar-15.co/threads/126747-...n-Self-Defense
These people were completely unarmed. Does that not also seems to be the SOP of these types of attacks. Whether the perp has a gun or ten ninjas with blades they never attack people who would be able to defend themselves.
The ststement that a few poeple on this train with concealed carry permits or hell even a law abiding citizen with a knife of his own may very well have made a difference.
I am not looking to start a fight, but you are way off base.
Last edited by rockhound; 03-03-2014 at 08:39.
Self control: The minds ability to override the body's urge to beat the living sh.. out of some ass.... who desperately deserves it.
The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.
Thomas Jefferson
Obama, so full of crap it is a miracle Air Force One can even get off the ground,
I merely pointed out that the assumption that the attackers would keep using knives when civilians could be armed was wrong. The place I happen to live at had nothing to do with the validity of my reasoning. And, as to what Gman said, I actually totally agree with it.
In this instance, 4 of the attackers were shot dead by an armed police officer. They kept charging at the officer after he had fired two warning shots, with only knives in their hands. So they didn't look like the kind who would give up or kill themselves.
Last edited by argv; 03-03-2014 at 12:11.
I'm not pretending squat. What I'm saying is that I don't think genocide in a far off land by group A vs group B is worth billions of U.S. dollars and countless lives of American citizens to stop it. Should we sacrifice some of ours to save a bunch of theirs? That's not a bargain you'll ever sell me on.
The world isn't a fair place. Was not, is not, won't be. Sure there have been genocides, and there will continue to be genocides well into the future, humans are animals and will remain so.
If you really want to go help oppressed people in foreign lands, there are a great many flights leaving DIA every single day that will take you there. My mother-in-law returned from Kigali last week and apparently they still need a fair bit of help in Rwanda, I'd suggest you get right on that.