Very nice break downOriginally Posted by Bailey Guns
You're BS just gets better and better. The best way to make yourself look like a condescending ass, which you have a real talent for doing, is to attempt to correct someone with incorrect information.
In the first place, these were not "requests". On the document in the OP it clearly states they are "Proposed Rules of Engagement". And it doesn't state how the "peaceful protesters" are required to conduct themselves. The demands are strictly to be adhered to on the part of the police. Fuck that. Secondly, the proposed RoEs state, "water bottles". Not glass, not plastic. Water bottles. Could be made of anything. Could be empty or full. It doesn't specify. So before you accuse others of not being able to read you might wanna check your comprehension skills as well. Because from what I can tell they're sorely lacking.
Wow. Go figure. An internet tough guy who apparently has never had the stones to face real violence on the street. You've got a lot of nerve calling the current and former LE officers on this forum (who've responded in this thread) "Barney Fife's". This is exactly the type of idiotic statement that gets you flamed over and over. Face it. Regardless of how many relatives you have in law enforcement you know absolutely nothing about what it takes to do the job in a world full of know-it-all people like you. People with your attitude are the type of people that makes cops have an "us vs them" attitude. It's not the thugs like Michael Brown. It's the idiots who should know better. At least Barney Fife had the courage to put the badge on...something you obviously don't have.
That's right. It happens over and over in communities where certain groups think they're above the law and entitled to certain privileges and respect based solely on race. They think that because there's always a pussy somewhere willing to say a set of demands like this is "reasonable".
Your constant references to fear seem to be projection more than anything else. First you call officers/former officers on the forum "Barney's" then you state there's some tremendous fear on the part of Joe Public towards police. Well that really doesn't make sense to me. Then again, most things you post here don't make sense. I haven't seen one LEO/former LEO here say the police should automatically respond with "shock and awe" or anything of the sort. Even I said they should ignore this list of demands and tell the community they have nothing to worry about if they want to peacefully demonstrate. Many people, including me, have said that the police response to law-breakers should be within the bounds of what the law allows. You're just making shit up now.
Colorado statutes defining a deadly weapon are clear on this. You're wrong. As usual. Any item whether animate or inanimate, which is capable of inflicting death or SBI in the manner in which it's used can be a deadly weapon. Period.
Do you have any idea how stupid this statement is? Probably not.
I'm guessing most all of this think this way. You're the only one that's brought up that sentiment without any sort of provocation other than several people are disagreeing with your nonsense.
Yeah...sounds familiar:
A minor infraction like a robbery and subsequent assault on a police officer where the robbery suspect attempted to disarm the officer? That sort of minor infraction?
It's not a bad thing as long as these protesters remain peaceful and understand they don't get to dictate police response.
Yeah...you're just a real reasonable guy, aren't ya? You can take your "Barney" bullshit and shove it up your....pie hole. Takes a real tough guy to say shit like that behind a keyboard.
Colorado AR-15 Shooters Club Discussion Forums
Welcome to the Colorado AR-15 Shooters Club Discussion Forums.
