Rep Lamborn compares Obama to a "tar baby"

[nynco]

zunde it exists all the time. Phrases can mean different things to different people. Just look at the different interpretation of religion for proof of that.

[sneakerd]

That hot slut has had a boob job, good for her- they look good! Other than that I think her legs need a little muscle. Meow

[roberth]

No. Neither is "reaching across the aisle" or "working together to forge a compromise" or any number of additional liberal bullshit platitudes.

Liberalism is destroying America. It should be illegal.

I don't think liberalism should be illegal, every country needs examples of evil and wrong, liberalism fills both those roles.

[Ranger]

Nynco-m-poop, I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt (and I really have no idea why) and say that I assume (yes, I know what that makes me) that you are just being silly and don't ACTUALLY believe that Ann Coulter is a tranny.

It's funny, if you Google the whole Ann Coulter Tranny thing about the only sites that come up asking about it, citing sources for it's fact or theorize about it are pretty hard core WAY beyond left blog sites. Hell, I didn't even know there were whackjobs that thought that until Nynco brought it up.

So to clarify (and try to tie this into the OP): Saying tar baby is taken out of context, said to obviously point to Obama being black, racist as all get out but it's totally OK to accuse Ann Coulter of being a tranny with NO proof of this whatsoever as an obvious attack on the right and it's OK. We expect this from the left, it's what (and many times ALL) they ever do, but GIMME A BREAK!

[Bailey Guns]

No its not real, its bullshit.

Dog whistles (or rather the accusation of their use) are the same Alynskite BS as accusing your enemies of being racists or sexists or homophobes ... or for that matter accusing them of being transsexuals.

The tactic is designed to marginalize and demonize your enemies so you don't have to actually engage in honest debate of the issues. Its the tactic of people that either know they would lose an honest fight, or don't care about an honest fight because they plan on murdering their enemies in death camps once they get enough power.

nynco, you may be right on the gun issues, but that's about it.

Couldn't agree with you more, Zund...with one little exception.

I don't think he's right on the gun issue at all. Anyone who supports a party that has at the heart of it's agenda infringing the 2A rights of citizens is not "right on gun issues". Regardless of how much he likes to shoot or how many guns he owns.

[Zundfolge]

Couldn't agree with you more, Zund...with one little exception.

I don't think he's right on the gun issue at all. Anyone who supports a party that has at the heart of it's agenda infringing the 2A rights of citizens is not "right on gun issues". Regardless of how much he likes to shoot or how many guns he owns.

I was giving him the benefit of the doubt ... you know us intolerant, bigoted, close minded right winger teabaggers are like that.

[Ronin13]

zunde it exists all the time. Phrases can mean different things to different people. Just look at the different interpretation of religion for proof of that.

That's a damn cop out and you know it. Someone could say "George Bush was a coke head in college," and it could be interpreted as him being a "white devil." I could call you anything and it can be taken out of context. I'd love to see you in a real, formal debate, you'd be eaten alive! And also, calling Ann Coulter a tranny clearly shows you have horrible taste in women- she's beautiful, sexy, smart, and one helluva great conservative contributor. Look at what you libs have: Hilary, Janet Reno, Pelosi! Jeezus, you'd think that liberals were 100% men by that lineup. Cut out the bullshit "Phrases can mean different things to different people" because we all know that, and only the most depraved, thick headed, ignorant people would call racist on the Lamborn remark. And Reagan was not using that "dog whistle" shit either. Get a freaking clue, please!

[Scanker19]

Could someone, in one sentence, explain what a liberal and conservitaves are?

Cause part of me sees the root of the word liberal as liberty, which I was told is a good thing.

That is serious question.

[Ronin13]

Could someone, in one sentence, explain what a liberal and conservitaves are?

Cause part of me sees the root of the word liberal as liberty, which I was told is a good thing.

That is serious question.

Libs believe in more government, more programs, and more regulation; conservatives believe in less government, less spending on bs programs like welfare, and less regulation- guns, freedom, and don't give them so much power.

[Scanker19]

Libs believe in more government, more programs, and more regulation; conservatives believe in less government, less spending on bs programs like welfare, and less regulation- guns, freedom, and don't give them so much power.

Who says?