There is no augment at all. I am NOT trying to get anywhere with it. The only point I made at all was that in the same gun (1911 Govt) that the 38 super was quicker than my 45 on follow up shots.
I actually tried this twice since I helped design and set up the course and it was about 2 seconds each time. As I said in my first post it is a personal decision and as a mod will not comment one way or another.
So tell me again where the argument is?
I see you running, tell me what your running from
Nobody's coming, what ya do that was so wrong.
Is this thread still going?![]()
Some of you may find this interesting.
http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/node/7866
Whatever you use, shoot 3 times.
This is awesome!. It pretty much supports everything the experts have said over the years:
Handguns are simply a means to fight your way to a rifle.
Smaller than 9mm is a last act of defiance, but a damn good one.
Shoot them till they quit or die.
Shoot what you can shoot accurately and stop worrying about all the rest of the garbage.
That's good stuff. There are mathematical ways to show the 9mm and mouse gun data had been effected by outside influences. I'm very happy to see he addressed this. I saw it when initially reviewing the data. I would have liked to see a secondary chart with the 9mm numbers reflecting only non-ball ammo. I suspect it would have reflected a more true graph.
Mom's comin' 'round to put it back the way it ought to be.
Anyone that thinks war is good is ignorant. Anyone that thinks war isn't needed is stupid.
I just carry my 25 acp because it has the same stopping power as the 45 acp and it is not as heavy, wow if only I would have known all these years that there is absolutely no difference in knock down power between different calibers I would have the same caliber in all my guns,