So 64 just got signed

[OneGuy67]

So there is a way to prove someone is driving under the influence and follow up with charges? But isn't it pretty tough to prove?

Yes. The legislative argument is what is going to be the defined limits of intoxication. You can drive with alcohol in your system and be under the legal defined limit. Right now, there is no legal defined limit for THC, so the prosecution hinges on officer observations and the proof, if you will, comes from the blood results. Failure to comply with the expressed consent law causes an administrative penalty of losing your license to drive for one year as well as the criminal prosecution in court. No test doesn't mean no prosecution; just a harder time in the prosecution.

[soldier-of-the-apocalypse]

yes it makes the best organic rope known to man and they made it legal during ww2 just for this reason, hep products were used through out the war and then made illegal again cause they thought it would make all the GI's lazy. it was originally made illeagal in the 30's because all the white folks thought all the darkies were getting high and raping all our white women .
here is some history http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_h...on_.281900s.29

[soldier-of-the-apocalypse]

[Great-Kazoo]

So there is a way to prove someone is driving under the influence and follow up with charges? But isn't it pretty tough to prove?

REM. dead give away.

[Ronin13]

REM. dead give away.

REM as in the band, or Rapid Eye Movement, or...?

[Monky]

REM as in the band, or Rapid Eye Movement, or...?

Just quit breathing.

[clublights]

Yes. The legislative argument is what is going to be the defined limits of intoxication. You can drive with alcohol in your system and be under the legal defined limit. Right now, there is no legal defined limit for THC, so the prosecution hinges on officer observations and the proof, if you will, comes from the blood results. Failure to comply with the expressed consent law causes an administrative penalty of losing your license to drive for one year as well as the criminal prosecution in court. No test doesn't mean no prosecution; just a harder time in the prosecution.

Not Correct ???

I thought ?

What is this I hear about 5 micrograms ?

[clublights]

REM as in the band, or Rapid Eye Movement, or...?

Just quit breathing.

No no It's a fair question


If your listening to REM ( the band) there is a good chance your too stoned to reach the radio dial !!

[Ronin13]

Just quit breathing.

For requesting a little clarity? Someone should probably go troll E. Colfax- you might need a little more than a hug.
ETA:

No no It's a fair question

If your listening to REM ( the band) there is a good chance your too stoned to reach the radio dial !!

That's why I said it... didn't know if Jim was joking like "Only someone stoned would have REM on their radio..."
I don't think it's a matter of too stoned to reach the dial, I think it's a matter of only someone stoned would willingly listen to REM...

[OneGuy67]

Not Correct ???

I thought ?

What is this I hear about 5 micrograms ?

5 nanograms is the limit that Representative King wants to put in place as a minimum level of THC intoxication to be charged with DUI/D. It is the intoxication level that other states have enacted. However, the pro pot community does not want this level as they argue you can have this amount in your system and not be what they consider to be under the influence.