-
Heres the part that maybe Gman doesn't get, (although there is no guarantee this is how the new law if passed and signed would be enforced). Say you live in California where there is an approved handgun roster, mag capacity limits, and is a may issue State. If you as a hypothetical California citizen apply for and successfully receive a concealed carry permit from a State that offers non-resident permits such as Utah or Florida you can legally carry in the State of California whatever firearm, magazine capacity, or ammunition is legal in the state from which you obtained your permit. This would of course significantly undermine most of the unconstitutional firearm laws in ban States pertaining to handguns.
For states that have constitutional carry such as Arizona and Vermont a resident needing to prove to law enforcement that he was lawfully concealed carrying a firearm in a ban state such as Hawaii or Maryland would only need a valid photo identification card issued from the constitutional carry State in which he or she resided.
There could and probably will be conflicts with laws such as the Colorado + 15 round capacity magazines that are not grandfathered under that law as that law is written in such a way that even having an out-of-State permit from say Utah where they do not have magazine restrictions might not necessarily be covered by the proposed National Reciprocity Law.
Obviously overzealous anti-gun legislators and state attorneys would probably counter-sue on some nitpicky grounds in an attempt to maintain their control over their citizens and safe face under the Trump administration.
Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk
Last edited by Joe_K; 12-07-2017 at 11:02.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules