Who do we like for SCOTUS?

[Bailey Guns]

I don't believe this at all. Not a bit. Another fabricated lie by democrats.

I hate 'em. But by God they are persistent.

[Skip]

Still no pubic hair and a Coke can. Welcome to the bench Justice Kavanaugh.

Perfect response!

You think Thomas and Kavanaugh just became friends?

I don't believe this at all. Not a bit. Another fabricated lie by democrats.

I hate 'em. But by God they are persistent.

It's 11th hour BS. The way it was drafted also implies criminality when it turns out the accuser didn't even accuse Kavanaugh of a crime, just an "attempt."

People on socials are saying Feinstein sat on this from July on and waited. We all know why... Less time = less time to prove innocence and #MeToo demands the presumption of guilt.

[Aloha_Shooter]

Over on Legal Insurrection, they said this very thing was predicted -- the Dems knew Grassley's staff would be organized so they staged a hit on his character for after hearings ended in order to upset Murkowski and Collins.

https://legalinsurrection.com/2018/0...is-allegation/

https://t.co/TMWf9uzzEV

[BPTactical]

Kabuki Theater at its sickest.

[10x]

This 11th hour accuser. Just the accusation with all the TV play makes him "guilty" in the Democrats mind. Any excuse they can make to derail a good man.

[Aloha_Shooter]

Same play they employed against Clarence Thomas. At a minimum, they hope to besmirch him forever like they did to Thomas and on the outside they hope to derail or delay his confirmation.

I don't have a problem with resurfacing an allegation that's decades old but 1) this is fuzzy, 2) Feinstein held onto it all summer as a last-ditch weapon instead of pushing it immediately to the FBI for confirmation or negation, 3) a clinical psychologist from CA who remembers this 30 years later during a marriage counseling session? Really? Juanita Broadrick's accusations (which were conveniently ignored by the mass media until they could say it was "old news") had contemporary corroboration -- she told people immediately after it happened, even if she didn't file charges.

Ole Bill had a fairly open history of using political, legal, and even physical force on women but the press conveniently ignored it all to focus on Bush's "lack of spine". I was less offended by how much Bill let the little head do his thinking than by the outright partisan skullduggery on the part of the mass media. Similarly, I am less concerned about the last minute allegations than the way Feinstein manipulated the process and clearly chose 2 months ago to hold onto this as a political attack. She ought to be vilified by the feminist press for this (but won't be).

[Skip]

They are trying to make this blow up and the accuser has stepped forward...

https://apnews.com/e2c35c0fb46f4464b...-comes-forward

“I thought he might inadvertently kill me,” said Ford, now a 51-year-old research psychologist in northern California. “He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.”

Ford, 51 and a clinical psychology professor at Palo Alto University in California, says she was able to get away after a friend of Kavanaugh’s who was in the room jumped on top of them and everyone tumbled.

So definitely not a politicized Dim then.

Ford’s husband, Russell Ford, also told the newspaper that his wife described during therapy being trapped in a room with two drunken boys and that one of them had pinned her to a bed, molested her and tried to prevent from screaming. He said he recalled his wife using Kavanaugh’s last name and expressing concern that Kavanaugh — then a federal judge — might someday be nominated to the Supreme Court.

Uh huh.

I too worry about all the Federal judges who might someday because Supreme Court Justices but only if I disagree with them.

The therapist’s notes say four boys were involved, but Ford says that was an error by the therapist. Ford says four boys were at the party, but only two boys were in the room at the time.

Sounds like Duke Lacrosse team party. Where she was the only female. Where she got every detail wrong and it doesn't matter because she's a victim. This all sounds very familiar.

And then kept her mouth shut from 198x (we still don't have a date/place) - 2012 because Kavanaugh is so dangerous he should be allowed to get rapey for 30+ years.

Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., a committee member, told The Washington Post and Politico in interviews Sunday that he’s “not comfortable” voting for Kavanaugh until he learns more about the allegation. Flake is one of 11 Republicans on the committee, whose 10 Democrats all oppose Kavanaugh. A potential “no” vote from Flake would complicate Kavanaugh’s prospects.

Feinstein applauded Flake’s call to slow things down.

“I agree with Senator Flake that we should delay this week’s vote,” she said. “There’s a lot of information we don’t know and the FBI should have the time it needs to investigate this new material.”

Thanks FLAKE.

Anyone know how the FBI investigates a non-crime that happened 30 years ago? Let alone gives Congress a definitive opinion on what happened.


The Legal Advisor for Kavanaugh’s Accuser Is a Big Time Democratic Donor, Thinks People Who Work for Trump Are 'Miscreants'

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/timoth...jones-n2519525

This one is good too. The people behind this are anything but objective.

Hey, it's all for women. Do you hate women?

[BPTactical]

Oh, it gets better....

Kavanaugh Accuser Signed Letter Fighting Trump Border Enforcement

The woman accusing President Trump's United States Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of a "rape attempt" when the two were in high school previously signed a letter fighting Trump's "Zero Tolerance" policy at the U.S.-Mexico border.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)an open borders advocacy organizationletter was written and sent to Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen and Attorney General Jeff Sessions in June.

Christine Blasey Ford, a psychology professor, signed the ACLU letter as "Christine Blasey Ph.D. Psychologist," signing off on statements that accused Trump of using southern border enforcement to "traumatize children" and claimed the Zero Tolerance policy was "violating fundamental human rights."

The policy to prosecute all illegal border crossers, enacted by the Trump administration, including illegal alien adults who cross the border with children, results in border-crossing parents having their children taken into federal custody. This is a loophole known as the Flores Settlement Agreement.

Detaining child border crossers was a policy during the Obama administration when Breitbart Texas exclusively reported on the conditions in which unaccompanied minors were being packed into crowded cells and holding facilities. As Breitbart News reported, the federal government has separated adult border crossers from the children they have brought with them into the U.S. as far back as 2001, court records reveal.

The ACLU letter, signed by Blasey, demanded the Trump administration stop the border enforcement policy, claiming the enforcement measure was an "intentional infliction of pain on children," calling it "inhumane."

Read the full letter here: https://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...r-enforcement/

And the brother works for Fusion GPS??

https://www.linkedin.com/in/ralph-blasey-5a84515/

http://walkersresearch.com/profilePa...100020756.html


Sour grapes?

https://af-mg.com/2018/09/17/breakin...was-the-judge/

[Zundfolge]

So in addition to Kavanaugh's accuse being a leftist activist and agitator, it appears that she may have a beef with the Kavanaugh family because:

Martha G. Kavanaugh, the mother of Brett Kavanaugh was a Maryland district judge in 1996. In an amazing coincidence, Martha Kavanaugh was the judge in a foreclosure case in which Christine Blasey-Ford’s parents were the defendants. Now it all becomes clear. Blasey-Ford is going after Brett Kavanaugh, not because of what he did in high school. Instead, Christine Blasey-Ford is going after Brett Kavanaugh out of spite and revenge for a case ruled on by Brett Kavanaugh mother. Martha Kavanaugh, Brett’s mother was Montgomery County Circuit Court judge from 1993 until she retired in 2001. During a 1996 foreclosure case, Martha Kavanaugh ruled against the parents of Christine Blasey-Ford in a foreclosure case.

The foreclosure case against Paula K. Blasey and Ralph G. Blasey was opened on August 8, 1996. The case number is 156006V

https://archive.fo/69gvf

If you go here: http://casesearch.courts.state.md.us...uiry-index.jsp and search for case number 156006V

You get the actual case (just can't link to it), so this is a pretty reliable source if you ask me.

[Skip]

I really think the Civil Justice system needs to change to address situations like this. A baseless accusation (proved by preponderance) should mean losing everything financial with the accuser's name on it.

I also think the Senate needs to subpoena and get her on the record. That way the accusation can't move as more facts (if any) are discovered.

One of the things people forget about Justice Thomas' hearing is that Anita Hill admitted to lying as soon as she was put under oath. She lied about coordinating the attack on Thomas with Congressional Dems. She had to admit to those communications under oath which seriously damaged the credibility of her claim.