Quote Originally Posted by Skip View Post
Consistent with 2A and even better!!! One would even point that NFA was the previous "compromise" made that Libs refuse to recognize today.

They claim Caetano is narrow though.

I still don't know how you protect in common use if the common use components (magazines, pistol grips, shoulder things that go up) are banned. And I don't know why it is legal to ban them if they aren't defined as dangerous and unusual because, per Miller, that is the standard as specifically applied to NFA.

These bans exist on some fairly tortured logic and I don't know why 2A is incorporated against the states the way other amendments have been. We even have McDonald!

Yeah, I'm ready to donate! But not to Dud.
Interesting reading here on the why's and how's of state/local bans:

http://arizonalawreview.org/pdf/59-3/59arizlrev773.pdf