Close
Page 8 of 14 FirstFirst ... 345678910111213 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 134

Thread: Ohio shooting

  1. #71
    Keyboard Operation Specialist FoxtArt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Montrose
    Posts
    2,784

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irving View Post
    I like this.

    I think there are other things, possibly, in play as well that help shape what we're seeing now. Just a rough idea floating around in my head that isn't fully fleshed out, so bare with me. Essentially we, as a species, are having a difficult time adjusting to the internet and how it now allows us to interact and communicate with the entire world. With the internet, anyone and everyone can have a voice. This leads to people thinking that because they can have a voice, that they should have voice. You can see this with how comment sections on videos and news articles and whatever just turn into a cesspool. Everyone is saying something, just to be part of the conversation, regardless of if what they are saying merits any consideration or not.
    I think what I'm trying to say is that in combination of what Bailey posted above about people taking an emotional roller coaster ride straight into the darkness, with no real coping mechanisms, this acting out might be an extension of spewing out garbage in a comment section, just to be heard. Of course not for every type of shooting. The guy who shot up his work probably wasn't trying to influence national politics, nor was the guy in Ohio who got denied from a bar. But people like the El Paso shooter who wrote a manifesto and thinks he's got the answers, but if only someone would listen to him, definitely. Which is sad because his manifesto is a mess and just reading it you can tell that he should be washing dishes and not trying to tackle national economic policy.

    I would not dare lay the sole blame on anyone thing (well except the person pulling the trigger), but I feel like there is a long list of things that influence and nudge people to do things like this.
    - The media churning out garbage click bait articles/stories/pieces, etc to keep up with a 24-hour news cycle.
    - Politics that have degraded so far that candidates are taking the social pulse of society to try and win elections like a popularity contest instead of actually ever trying to solve anything.
    - The news cycle constantly highlighting how bad everything is to the point that no one feels like the government is capable of solving any problem at all, so people better act on their own.
    - The government not being capable of actually solving problems.
    To help you flesh out your theory, we are not biologically engineered to communicate non-visually. Normal communication involves the constant sub conscious analyzing of the body language of the person you are talking to in response to each statement. If they start to display indications of hostility, oops, we modify our conversation. If a sudden change in body language is observed, we naturally adapt our conversation. If body language display heightened interest, we keep going. If their eyes are wandering, and they are turned away from us, we realize they are bored. If they display indications of sexual interest, we fuck it all up and they end up walking away.

    Okay, some people are slightly better than others at it, but the point is: we are biologically engineered to see the ramifications of our communication.

    To top it off, when we are in a situation of face to face communication, we also imply risk: If we piss someone off enough, they are not powerless. They can cry, invoke the hostility of others, or even hit us.

    When people are on the internet, it's no different than when they are in a vehicle. They no longer see someone's face, no they no longer see any consequences, they are not connected to their biological subconscious communication system. The boil over and delve into "fuck you" and "you stupid fuckers". They do things they would never do in a face to face context. They get racist, sexist, violent, hostile.

    You are right in the internet being a huge contributing factor in peoples loss of social skill and an increase in loneliness, and the above ^^ is the precise reason.

    ETA/PS: That subconscious communication system is a part of an advanced empathetic reaction. A lot of people mistake "empathy" for "sympathy", Empathy is merely being able to "feel" what other people "feel", even if you hate them for it. Most of it is under the hood. As people spend less time in face-to-face conversations when they are younger, their empathy is underdeveloped - and this is seen in broad, national surveys that span about three decades - there is a significant decrease in empathy observed in teens since the widespread rise of social media; and an increase in narcissism.

    ETA 2: For your reading, referring to the long analysis: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/b...oung-americans
    Last edited by FoxtArt; 08-04-2019 at 22:31.

  2. #72
    Zombie Slayer
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Pueblo
    Posts
    6,974

    Default

    Toxicology report should be interesting. Wonder if we even get to see it. If he didn't get a head wound maybe a CAT scan too.
    Per Ardua ad Astra

  3. #73
    Ammosexual GilpinGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Rural Gilpin County
    Posts
    7,221

    Default

    Gun homicides have been declining since the mid 90's. Obviously more gun control is the answer. Oh wait.....the media claims it's at an all time high.

    If anti 2a folks were smart, they would use these stats to try to (unsuccessfully) show a correlation between stricter gun control and a lower gun homicide rate. Except this would come up:

    An interesting correlation with the drop in firearm murders is the incredible expansion of private firearm ownership. In other words, the number of privately-owned firearms was increasing at the same time that the number of firearm murders was plummeting.
    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...last-25-years/

  4. #74
    a cool, fancy title hollohas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Littleton
    Posts
    6,072

    Default

    Well, he opened the door...

  5. #75
    Ammocurious Rucker61's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Posts
    3,359

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hollohas View Post
    Well, he opened the door...
    What can you expect from a New York Democrat?
    Te occidere possunt sed te edere non possunt nefas est

    Sane person with a better sight picture

  6. #76
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Highlands Ranch
    Posts
    1,959

    Default

    Why dont these morons (politicians) understand that background checks dont work, nor will ever work at stopping any future criminal? They only look back, but can see future acts. So z potential criminal with a clean record will pass everytime.

    It's nothing more than a feel good pat on the back to say they "care" and did something.

    I'm waiting for the day we have AI evaluating all recordings from these devices spying on us that we voluntarily placed in our homes. Then if the AI predict that you are about to commit a crime, you are rounded up and sent to jail for a crime that never occurred. Yes...minority report could be coming but using tech instead of psychics.

  7. #77
    a cool, fancy title hollohas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Littleton
    Posts
    6,072

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rucker61 View Post
    What can you expect from a New York Democrat?
    It's exactly what I've been expecting since his primary.

    If he goes down this road, he WILL lose the election, no doubt in my mind.

    He's always seen guns as a bargaining chip. Trade guns for the border. It's not going to work...
    Last edited by hollohas; 08-05-2019 at 06:33.

  8. #78
    Possesses Antidote for "Cool" Gman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Puyallup, WA
    Posts
    17,848

    Default

    By using the argument for 'background checks' as an answer to control people misusing tools, just require background checks for heroin, fentanyl, and other opioids that are misused by people. The opioid epidemic is solved.

    People break. There have always been broken people. It's a difficult problem to fix, and removing the human threat from society has become passe and the institutions to deal with them have been dissolved.

    This expectation of safety is a modern concept and is outside the structure of nature.

    We protect predators among the flock, then act all surprised when they start killing the sheep.
    Last edited by Gman; 08-05-2019 at 07:22.
    Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
    -Me

    I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
    -Also Me


  9. #79
    a cool, fancy title hollohas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Littleton
    Posts
    6,072

    Default

    The Ohio killer was a confirmed super leftist so we can be sure all the attention will be focused on El Paso.

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-0...ers-antifa-and

  10. #80
    Possesses Antidote for "Cool" Gman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Puyallup, WA
    Posts
    17,848

    Default

    Side Note: As these recent issues arose, I kept being reminded how little we still know about the Las Vegas massacre.
    Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
    -Me

    I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
    -Also Me


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •