If we were the left, we'd show up at his house and place of business and start protesting and mostly peacefully protesting...
If we were the left, we'd show up at his house and place of business and start protesting and mostly peacefully protesting...
I'll stop buying black rifles when my wife stops buying black shoes.
Interesting...
Company that employed man charged in deadly shooting has no employees with security guard licenses
https://kdvr.com/news/local/company-...uard-licenses/
DENVER (KDVR) - FOX31 obtained licensing documents for Isborn Security Services LLC, the company stating it is responsible for subcontracting Denver rally shooting suspect Matthew Dolloff.
The company has an active security guard business license that does not expire until Sept. 10, 2021.
However, there is no record found for any individual other than Matthew Isborn, the company's owner, being licensed or applying for a individual security guard license with Isborn Security Services.
Last edited by .455_Hunter; 10-16-2020 at 12:57.
Not interesting, basic sub-contracting.
I bet they also have no employees with insurance or W2s. That stuff is all on the contractors, which is the entire point of sub-contracting.
Last edited by Irving; 10-16-2020 at 13:24.
I found a number of individuals on LinkedIn that claim to be contractors for Isborn. Wonder how many of them are licensed?
The security company is telling their customers that the guards are able to work in Denver, which is not the case. Sub-contracting the guard without verifying their basic credentials is negligence. My company sub-contracts all the time, and there are clauses in-place to ensure the subs demonstrate compliance with regulations.
It's a semantics issue. Any "employees" of the company are likely administrative and wouldn't have the licensing. The guards aren't employees, thus no employees in the company with the proper licensing. I don't KNOW that's the case, but I'm betting that's the case.