Did you hear that knock on your door?
Did you hear that knock on your door?
My Feedback
Credit TFOGGER : Liberals only want things to be "fair and just" if it benefits them.
Credit Zundfolge: The left only supports two "rights"; Buggery and Infanticide.
Credit roberth: List of things Government does best; 1. Steal your money 2. Steal your time 3. Waste the money they stole from you. 4. Waste your time making you ask permission for things you have a natural right to own. "Anyone that thinks the communists won't turn off your power for being on COAR15 is a fucking moron."
Reading this, it's not a felony for an FFL gunsmith to accept a COMPLETED lower to be coated or assembled.
The ATF prohibits them from doing any of the work required to take it from a "non-firearm" casting/forging to a functional "firearm" (in the case of an AR-15 lower, this would be the milling of the FCG pocket, drilling the trigger, hammer, and selector holes, and milling the rear pocket). But there is specific allowance for them to work on a 100% frame/receiver.
There isn't a requirement for a serial number to have work completed on a firearm by an FFL gunsmith, because otherwise, many pre-1968 guns couldn't be serviced/modified/etc. They were never manufactured with a serial number, and I know for a fact that there are systems/methods in place for recording the non-serialized firearm in the A&D log, so as to stay within the legal constraints laid out by the ATF.
So, it looks like having them properly anodized is not actually a felony. Now, as has been stated, some shops are going to be resistant to this, so YMMV.
^^That is the way I always understood the law to be, hence my confusion with all this felony talk. What is the difference between anodizing and engraving a completed firearm?
There is good reason to believe that the 80% lower will become a regulatory focus for feel-good gun control in the near future. So those who may wish to stay well back from the line are prudent.
Sayonara
The Great Kazoo's Feedback
"when you're happy you enjoy the melody but, when you're broken you understand the lyrics".
The banned troll notwithstanding...
Just to take issue the statements that 80% lowers are always made from 6061, this is from tacticalmachining:
"These 80% AR-15 Lower receivers start as 7075-T6 forgings from the lead forge in the US and are fully machined to mil-spec tolerances. The operations left to be completed are as follows/ fire control group, trigger pin, hammer pin, trigger slot and the safety selector hole. These are our Gen2 80s and have the rear lug area cut out. This is a not an FFL item. This is not a complete receiver and still requires machining to be done. We have a copy of our ATF determination letter and our determination update stating that it is not a firearm."
I have personally machined these, and have not run into any issues (but used a small mill and end mills, not a drill press)... yes, they're hard for aluminum, but nothing my small mill couldn't handle.
Are there crap 80% lowers? hell, yes! are there crap 100% lowers? hell, yes! are there crap BCGs, barrels, LPKs, and just about every other part on ar15s? HELL, YES!!
welcome to capitalism! there will always be somebody trying to make a buck by undercutting quality.
ETA: you want a real challenging project, get some 0% forgings and look up Vader Spade's tutorial on machining it completely...
Last edited by 68Charger; 09-27-2016 at 08:40.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ, we are the III%, CIP2, and some other catchphrase meant to aggravate progreSSives who are hell bent on taking rights away...
The Great Kazoo's Feedback
"when you're happy you enjoy the melody but, when you're broken you understand the lyrics".
I had forgotten that the TM lowers were 7075-T6.
I had the same experience on the bridgeport, they were completely workable, and when paired with a standard mil-spec upper, they fit with all the correct dimensions.
I also, for the fun of it, did one with the http://www.80percentarms.com drill and router jig. It took longer, and I had to make smaller cuts, but the end result was just as functional, if not quite as nice of a finish where the milling was done.
I'll just drop this here. Assuming one takes the thickness of the anodizing into account when machining, this might be an option. Not that I'm ever going to monkey with it, as I have more commercial lowers in the safe than I'm likely to be able to build in the foreseeable future...
http://www.caswellplating.com/anodiz...ng-system.html
Light a fire for a man, and he'll be warm for a day, light a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life...
Discussion is an exchange of intelligence. Argument is an exchange of
ignorance. Ever found a liberal that you can have a discussion with?
https://www.atf.gov/firearms/qa/does...cquisition-and
Nope. Overnight, it goes in the bound books and they have to have an FFL. So, the COMPLETED lower must have the relevant information engraved on the lower to be entered. No info, it can't be kept. The owner has to stay with it. 80% shit boxes didn't exist before the requirement for serial numbers. They don't get a free pass as pre-68 guns do.
You are absolutely giving out the wrong information and you need to stop before some unfortunate person believes you. You don't have to believe me. Call the ATF: Industry Operations (303) 575-7640.
Shoot more, post less.
Mom's comin' 'round to put it back the way it ought to be.
Anyone that thinks war is good is ignorant. Anyone that thinks war isn't needed is stupid.