View Full Version : Links To Listen/Watch Colorado Legislative Hearings Online Thread
Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
[
8]
The fee will be $100?!?!
The goal of Democrats is disarmament. Since they still have the annoying bill of rights to work around, they will have to stick to placing as many barriers to legal gun ownership as possible. This law limits it to the cost of the check (~$12) but that is tacked on top of what the FFL charges for transfers and can be amended in the future to strike that provision. Give them enough time and gun ownership will be reserved for the rich.
Rooskibar03
02-18-2013, 15:03
Scumbags, they know this will not stop violence or crime.[fail] [Bang]
Im feeling like some violence right now.
Singlestack
02-18-2013, 15:04
The Dem Levi says that by backing no CCW on college campuses that kids will be safe. No explanation of course. "There is nothing we can do". "What draws a killer to a campus is relationships"
Next week I'll get stabbed on campus to prove her wrong
The Dem Levi says that by backing no CCW on college campuses that kids will be safe. No explanation of course. "There is nothing we can do". "What draws a killer to a campus is relationships"
I've already told her that if I am ever subjected to violence on campus or while travelling to or from campus, I am going to leave the hospital to show up bloody and bruised to her office and make her look me in the eyes while she tells me how she made me safer.
StagLefty
02-18-2013, 15:07
All 4 bills passed to Senate
two shoes
02-18-2013, 15:09
The Dem Levi says that by backing no CCW on college campuses that kids will be safe. No explanation of course. "There is nothing we can do". "What draws a killer to a campus is relationships"
So logically they should ban relationships... Problem Solved!!!
How anyone can support gun free zones when nearly every damn mass shooting in America has happened in a gun free zone is staggering.
Not having much confidence any of this will get stopped. I am not totally up on "politicaleez" but I believe it is possible, with enough signatures, to put up a referendum to have it put on the ballot for the next state wide election. Seems I've seen this type of thing in the past. Anyone know? The way it's going I'm thinking it may be our best shot.
Aloha_Shooter
02-18-2013, 17:20
Well this makes it easy for the BGC. See who voted yes.
http://localtvkdvr.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/house-bill-again.jpg?w=402
So in text form, we have the following voting Aye for BGC:
Buckner
Court
Duran
Exum
Fields
Fischer
Foote
Garcia
Ginal
Hamner
Hulinghorst
Kagan
Kraft-Tharp
Labuda
Lebsock
Lee
Levy
May
McCann
McLachlan
Melton
Mitsh-Bush
Morieno
Pabon (?)
Peniston
Pettersen
Primavera
Rosenthal
Ryden
Salazar
Schafer
Singer
Tyler
Williams
Young
Speaker
And voting NAY:
Buck
Conti
Coram
Delgrosso
Dore
Everett
Gardner
Gerou
Holbert
Humphrey
Josh
Landgraf
Lawrence
McNulty
Murray
Navarro
Nordberg
Priola
Rankin
Saine
Scott
Sonnenberg
Stephens
Swalm
Szabo
Vigil
Waller
Wilson
Wright
We should all write thank yous to those who voted NAY and CC those who voted AYE saying we will support reelection of those voting NAY and do what we can toward recall or defeat of those who voted AYE.
Online, it tells you what their occupations are/were. A LOT of past educators/attorneys/legislators in there...mostly voting Dem.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.